PUTTICK, Keith (2002) Decisions, Revisions, and Supersessions: 'Appealability' in the ECHR Article 6 Era. Welfare Benefits, 9 (2). pp. 21-33. ISSN 1353-1123
This is the latest version of this item.
Abstract or description
Evaluates the impact of the ECHR, especially article 6 (including the right to a fair trial of civil matters), on appeals and review in the Social Security system.Given the limited coverage of the welfare system, especially in the area of community care law and jurisdictions where no appeal is permitted, it is unlikely that the present regime is article 6 compliant. This makes a number of key areas inaccessible to many users of the system - an issue that on-going reforms to the appeals system may hopefully address.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Depositing User: | Keith PUTTICK |
Date Deposited: | 17 Sep 2013 11:30 |
Last Modified: | 24 Feb 2023 03:47 |
URI: | https://eprints.staffs.ac.uk/id/eprint/1499 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Decisions, Revisions, and Supersessions: 'Appealability' in the ECHR Article 6 Era. (deposited 11 Sep 2013 11:43)
- Decisions, Revisions, and Supersessions: 'Appealability' in the ECHR Article 6 Era. (deposited 17 Sep 2013 11:30) [Currently Displayed]