Negrini, Stefano, Minozzi, Silvia, Bettany-Saltikov, Josette, CHOCKALINGAM, Nachiappan, Grivas, Theodoros B, Kotwicki, Tomasz, Maruyama, Toru, Romano, Michele and Zaina, Fabio (2016) Braces for Idiopathic Scoliosis in Adolescents. Spine, 41 (23). pp. 1813-1825. ISSN 0362-2436
eprints2422.pdf - Publisher's typeset copy
Available under License Type All Rights Reserved.
Download (927kB) | Preview
Abstract or description
STUDY DESIGN
A Cochrane Systematic Review OBJECTIVE.: To evaluate the efficacy of bracing for adolescents with AIS versus no treatment or other treatments, on quality of life, disability, pulmonary disorders, progression of the curve, psychological and cosmetic issues.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA
Idiopathic scoliosis is a three-dimensional deformity of the spine. The most common form is diagnosed in adolescence. While adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) can progress during growth and cause a surface deformity, it is usually not symptomatic.
METHODS
Search methodsWe searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, five other databases, and two trials registers up to February 2015. We also checked reference lists and hand searched grey literature.Selection criteriaRCTs and prospective controlled cohort studies comparing braces with no treatment, other treatment, surgery, and different types of braces for adolescent with AIS.Data collection and analysisWe used standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration.
RESULTS
We included seven studies. Five were planned as RCTs, two as prospective CCT's. One RCT failed completely, another was continued as an observational study. There was very low quality evidence from one small RCT that quality of life (QoL) during treatment did not differ significantly between rigid bracing and observation.
CONCLUSIONS
Two studies showed that bracing did not change QoL during treatment, and QoL, back pain psychological and cosmetic issues in the long term (16 years.) All papers showed that bracing prevented curve progression. The high rate of failure of RCTs demonstrates the huge difficulties in performing RCTs in a field where parents reject randomization of their children.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
1.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Faculty: | Previous Faculty of Health Sciences > Psychology, Sport and Exercise |
Depositing User: | Nachiappan CHOCKALINGAM |
Date Deposited: | 19 Sep 2016 09:11 |
Last Modified: | 24 Feb 2023 03:48 |
URI: | https://eprints.staffs.ac.uk/id/eprint/2422 |