Jolley, Daniel and Douglas, Karen (2017) Prevention is better than cure: Addressing anti-vaccine conspiracy theories. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47 (8). pp. 459-469. ISSN 0021-9029
Jolley Douglas 2017 Intervention.docx - AUTHOR'S ACCEPTED Version (default)
Available under License Type All Rights Reserved.
Download (274kB)
Abstract or description
The current research tested if explicit anti-conspiracy arguments could be an effective method of addressing the potentially harmful effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories. In two studies, participants were presented with anti-conspiracy arguments either before, or after reading arguments in favor of popular conspiracy theories concerning vaccination. In both studies, anti-conspiracy arguments increased intentions to vaccinate a fictional child but only when presented prior to conspiracy theories. This effect was mediated by belief in anti-vaccine conspiracy theories and the perception that vaccines are dangerous. These findings suggest that people can be inoculated against the potentially harmful effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories, but that once they are established, the conspiracy theories may be difficult to correct.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Faculty: | School of Life Sciences and Education > Psychology |
Depositing User: | Daniel JOLLEY |
Date Deposited: | 26 May 2017 10:25 |
Last Modified: | 24 Feb 2023 13:46 |
URI: | https://eprints.staffs.ac.uk/id/eprint/3131 |