Staffordshire University logo
STORE - Staffordshire Online Repository

The effect of randomised exposure to different types of natural outdoor environments compared to exposure to an urban environment on people with indications of psychological distress in Catalonia.

Triguero-Mas, Margarita and GIDLOW, Christopher and Martínez, David and de Bont, Jeroen and Carrasco-Turigas, Glòria and Martínez-Íñiguez, Tania and HURST, Gemma and MASTERSON, Daniel and Donaire-Gonzalez, David and Seto, Edmund and Jones, Marc V and Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark J (2017) The effect of randomised exposure to different types of natural outdoor environments compared to exposure to an urban environment on people with indications of psychological distress in Catalonia. PloS one, 12 (3). e0172200. ISSN 1932-6203

[img]
Preview
Text
TRIGUERO_Mas_etal_The effect of randomised exposure to different types of natural outdoor environments compared to exposure to an urban environment on people with_Plos.pdf - Publisher's typeset copy
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Download (760kB) | Preview
[img] Text
TRIGUERO_Mas_etal_The effect of randomised exposure to different types of natural outdoor environments compared to exposure to an urban environment on people with_Suppl_PlosOne_2017.doc - Supplemental Material
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Download (40kB)

Abstract or description

INTRODUCTION

Experimental studies have reported associations between short-term exposure to natural outdoor environments (NOE) and health benefits. However, they lack insight into mechanisms, often have low external and ecological validity, and have rarely focused on people with some psycho-physiological affection. The aim of this study was to use a randomized, case-crossover design to investigate: (i) the effects of unconstrained exposure to real natural and urban environments on psycho-physiological indicators of people with indications of psychological distress, (ii) the possible differential effects of 30 and 30+180 minutes exposures, and (iii) the possible mechanisms explaining these effects.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

People (n = 26) with indications of psychological distress were exposed to green (Collserola Natural Park), blue (Castelldefels beach) and urban (Eixample neighbourhood) environments in Catalonia. They were exposed to all environments in groups for a period of 30+180 minutes between October 2013 and January 2014. During the exposure period, participants were instructed to do what they would usually do in that environment. Before, during (at 30 and 30+180 minutes) and after each exposure, several psycho-physiological measures were taken: mood (measured as Total Mood Disturbance, TMD), attention capacity (measured as backwards digit-span task), stress levels (measures as salivary cortisol), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, autonomous nervous system (assessed as heart rate variability and the indicators: low frequency power (LF), high frequency power (HF), ratio between LF and HF (LF:HF), and coefficients of component variance of LF, HF, and LF:HF). We also measured several potential mediators: air pollution, noise, physical activity, social interactions, and self-perceived restoration experience.

RESULTS

When compared with responses to urban environment, we found statistically significantly lower TMD [-4.78 (-7.77, -1.79) points difference], and salivary cortisol [-0.21 (-0.34, -0.08) log nmol/L] in the green exposure environment, and statistically significantly lower TMD [-4.53 (-7.57, -1.49) points difference], and statistically significant favourable changes in heart rate variability indicators (specifically LF:HF and CCV-LF:HF with around -0.20 points of difference of the indicators) in the blue exposure environment. Physical activity and self-perceived restoration experience partially mediated the associations between NOE and TMD. Physical activity and air pollution partially mediated the associations between NOE and heart rate variability.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

This study extends the existing evidence on the benefits of NOE for people's health. It also suggests NOE potential as a preventive medicine, specifically focusing on people with indications of psychological distress.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02624921.

Item Type: Article
Faculty: School of Life Sciences and Education > Psychology
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Gemma HURST
Date Deposited: 16 Jun 2017 09:06
Last Modified: 16 Jun 2017 09:19
URI: http://eprints.staffs.ac.uk/id/eprint/3230

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

DisabledGo Staffordshire University is a recognised   Investor in People. Sustain Staffs
Legal | Freedom of Information | Site Map | Job Vacancies
Staffordshire University, College Road, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire ST4 2DE t: +44 (0)1782 294000