Staffordshire University logo
STORE - Staffordshire Online Repository

“We have to change our mindsets”: A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators in research collaboration across Integrated Care System organisations

GIDLOW, Christopher, SAMS, Lorna, BUCKLESS, Kim, ELLIS, Naomi, Duffy, Helen, Lambley-Burke, Ruth, Campbell, Paul, Dziedzic, Krysia, Brookes, Matthew, CHOCKALINGAM, Nachiappan, Devall, Pam and Mallen, Christian (2024) “We have to change our mindsets”: A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators in research collaboration across Integrated Care System organisations. BMC Health Services Research. (In Press)

[img] Text
SSHERPa Qualitative paper - post-print.pdf - AUTHOR'S ACCEPTED Version (default)
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License All Rights Reserved.

Download (363kB) | Request a copy

Abstract or description

Background
The introduction of Integrated Care Systems (ICS) in England aimed to increase joint planning and delivery of health and social care, and other services, to better meet the needs of local communities. There is an associated duty to undertake collaborative research across ICS partners to inform this new integrated approach, which might be challenging given that organisations span health, local authority, voluntary and community sector, and research. This study aimed to explore the appetite for collaborative Research and Innovation (R&I) across ICSs, potential barriers and solutions.

Methods
This qualitative study involved semi-structured interviews with 24 stakeholders who held senior positions within organisations across two ICS areas (Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent; Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin). Interview transcripts were analysed using inductive and deductive analysis, first mapping to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), then considering key influences on organisational behaviour in terms of Capability, Opportunity and Motivation from the COM-B Behaviour Change Wheel.

Results
There were fundamental limitations on organisational opportunities for collaborative R&I: a historical culture of competition (rather than collaboration), a lack of research culture and prioritisation, compounded by a challenging adverse economic environment. However, organisations were motivated to undertake collaborative R&I. They recognised the potential benefits (e.g., skill-sharing, staff development, attracting large studies and funding), the need for collaborative research that mirrors integrated care, and subsequent benefits for care recipients. Related barriers included negative experiences of collaboration, fear of failing and low confidence. Capability varied across organisations in terms of research skills and confidence, which reflected the range of partners (from local authorities to NHS Trusts, primary care, and academic institutions).

Conclusion
These findings indicate a need to shift from a culture of competition to collaboration, and to help organisations across ICS to prioritise research, and share resources and skills to mitigate the limiting effects of a constrained economic environment. This could be further explored using a systems change approach, to develop the collaborative research efforts alongside the overarching move towards integrated care.

Item Type: Article
Faculty: School of Life Sciences and Education > Sport and Exercise
Depositing User: Christopher GIDLOW
Date Deposited: 01 Mar 2024 14:06
Last Modified: 02 Mar 2024 04:30
URI: https://eprints.staffs.ac.uk/id/eprint/8118

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

DisabledGo Staffordshire University is a recognised   Investor in People. Sustain Staffs
Legal | Freedom of Information | Site Map | Job Vacancies
Staffordshire University, College Road, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire ST4 2DE t: +44 (0)1782 294000