MCGARRY, John (2020) Carltona – A Matter of Intention. Judicial Review. ISSN 1085-4681
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview
McGarry - Carltona a matter of intention final version.pdf - AUTHOR'S ACCEPTED Version (default)
Available under License Type All Rights Reserved (Under Embargo).
Download (219kB) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2020.1813011
Abstract or description
In this article, I use the Supreme Court’s decision in R v Adams to argue that identifying the intention of Parliament is the key to determining whether the Carltona principle applies to a particular exercise of Ministerial power. I examine the various factors considered by the Court when ascertaining Parliament’s intention. I also note the Court’s reference to the rule in Pepper v Hart.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | The Carltona principle; Ministerial power; Pepper v Hart |
Faculty: | School of Law, Policing and Forensics > Law |
Depositing User: | John MCGARRY |
Date Deposited: | 20 Nov 2020 11:54 |
Last Modified: | 24 Feb 2023 03:50 |
URI: | https://eprints.staffs.ac.uk/id/eprint/6624 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
CARLTONA – A MATTER OF INTENTION. (deposited 15 Oct 2020 15:23)
- Carltona – A Matter of Intention. (deposited 20 Nov 2020 11:54) [Currently Displayed]